In many discussions with senior leadership teams, when employee turnover becomes a topic of concern, the most common reflex is to review salaries, revisit policies, or adjust benefits. However, when we analyze cases in which employees leave after six months to one or two years, one factor consistently emerges as the most decisive: the direct manager.
In practice, most employees do not leave the organization first. They leave their direct manager. This is precisely why middle managers play a decisive role in employee retention.
Middle Managers Are the Employee’s Daily Point of Contact
Senior leadership defines strategy, vision, and culture, but the person employees interact with every day is their middle manager. How tasks are assigned, feedback is given, recognition is expressed, mistakes are handled, and decisions are made by direct managers ultimately defines the employee’s actual work experience.
Even the strongest HR strategy can be completely undermined if middle managers:
Conversely, a capable direct manager can help employees endure high pressure, navigate difficult periods, and remain committed to the organization.

Common Capability Gaps Among Middle Managers
In many organizations, middle managers are promoted because of their technical expertise rather than their readiness to lead people. As a result, they often lack or underperform in several critical capabilities:
Without these capabilities, middle managers tend to fall into one of two extremes: either taking on too much work themselves or exercising excessive control. Both quickly lead to employee fatigue and declining motivation.
Middle Managers Shape the Employee Work Experience
Employees stay not only because of the job itself, but because they feel valued, respected, and able to grow. Middle managers determine:
When negative work experiences persist, even high-potential employees with strong initial commitment will eventually choose to leave.
.png)
Why the “70%” Figure Is Not an Exaggeration
Across numerous international studies and through practical consulting experience, a substantial proportion of employee turnover can be directly linked to middle management. This does not imply that all issues are caused by middle managers, but rather reflects their position as the critical link between strategy and execution, and between senior leadership and employees.
When this link is weak, even well-designed policies struggle to translate into daily operations. Conversely, when middle managers are capable, they can effectively “translate” strategy into concrete actions, enabling employees to understand, perform, and remain engaged.
Employee Retention Begins with Developing Middle Managers
Organizations seeking to address turnover cannot focus solely on recruitment or compensation. They must invest deliberately in:
When middle managers are equipped with the right capabilities, they become organizational stabilizers—supporting employee growth, ensuring operational continuity, and reducing dependency on senior leadership.
Retention Is Not an HR Task—It Is a Management Capability
Employee retention is neither a short-term program nor solely the responsibility of the HR department. It is fundamentally a people management capability, with middle managers playing a central role.
If organizations genuinely aim to build a sustainable leadership pipeline, the critical question is not “Why are employees leaving?” but rather “Are our middle managers ready to lead and develop people?”
---
Lead-UP Academy | Learn to Act – Act to Lead



For many years, KPIs have been a familiar concept in corporate management. Almost every organization has KPIs, every department is assigned targets, and every individual is given numerical goals. However, as organizations enter the digital era—where data, technology, and AI fundamentally reshape operations—an increasing number of companies face a paradox: KPIs are abundant, yet actual performance improvement remains limited.
2025 has been a distinctive year. Many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have managed to sustain operations and, in some cases, achieve modest growth. However, a common sentiment among leaders is one of fatigue, tension, and a lack of operational ease. What is particularly noteworthy is that this level of exhaustion is not proportional to the effectiveness achieved.
Vietnam’s economy is entering a challenging phase: markets are volatile, input costs are rising, consumer behavior is shifting, skilled labor is scarce, and customers are becoming increasingly demanding.
Throughout our journey accompanying many service enterprises in Vietnam, we at Lead-UP Academy have repeatedly encountered familiar situations: the business is growing, customers are increasing, yet internal operations begin to get... “messy.” Senior employees work based on habit. New employees work based on personal interpretation. And leaders become weary because “everything depends on people” when there is still no clear operational system with standardized procedures and practices.
As a department head, deputy manager, or team leader, you are the “bridge” between senior leadership and frontline employees. The success or failure of your department largely depends on how you organize, lead, and adapt. And today’s context is fundamentally different from the past: we are living in the AI & VUCA era – where everything is volatile (Volatility), uncertain (Uncertainty), increasingly complex (Complexity), and often ambiguous (Ambiguity). So, what does the “portrait” of a mid-level manager look like in order not just to survive, but to truly thrive in this environment?
In recent conversations with businesses, we have noticed a recurring question: “How can we retain and develop Gen Z – the young generation of employees who are increasingly making up a large share of the workforce?”