2025 has been a distinctive year. Many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have managed to sustain operations and, in some cases, achieve modest growth. However, a common sentiment among leaders is one of fatigue, tension, and a lack of operational ease. What is particularly noteworthy is that this level of exhaustion is not proportional to the effectiveness achieved.
Through our work and consulting engagements with SMEs across various industries, we have observed a shared pattern: the core issue does not lie in a lack of effort or capability, but rather in a set of familiar operational failures that have been repeated for years without being fundamentally addressed. The year 2025 has simply made these issues more visible and more urgent.
1. Too Many Objectives, Too Little Focus
Many organizations entered 2025 with an extensive list of objectives: growth, digital transformation, cost optimization, customer experience enhancement, and workforce development. The challenge, however, lies in the absence of clear prioritization. In some cases, these objectives even contradict one another during execution.
When everything is treated as “critical,” teams are forced to pursue everything simultaneously. The result is extensive activity without sufficient depth in any single area to generate meaningful change. Operations become increasingly burdensome, while effectiveness is dispersed.
2. Processes Exist on Paper, Not in Practice
Another common operational failure is the existence of well-documented processes that do not truly govern day-to-day work. Employees rely on habit, personal experience, or “the old way of doing things,” while formal processes are referenced primarily during audits or evaluations.
When processes are not applied consistently, errors must be resolved manually. This increases the workload for managers, prolongs resolution time, and causes the system to depend on individuals rather than standardized operations.

3. Decision-Making Concentrated at the Top
In many SMEs, leaders have become the “final point of resolution” for most issues—from strategic decisions to minor operational matters. This dynamic places leaders under excessive pressure, while middle management gradually becomes passive.
When decisions must await approval from the top, organizations respond slowly, miss opportunities, and expend significant energy on matters that could otherwise be resolved at lower levels. This is one of the reasons why expansion often leads to greater operational strain rather than increased efficiency.
4. Fragmented Internal Coordination
The year 2025 has also highlighted persistent bottlenecks in cross-functional collaboration. Departments optimize around their own objectives but lack effective coordination mechanisms. As a result, work is passed back and forth, accountability remains unclear, and no single unit takes full ownership of outcomes.
This fragmentation not only delays progress but also fuels internal conflict, undermining collaboration and eroding trust among teams.

5. Subjective Performance Measurement
Many organizations continue to assess performance primarily through personal judgment, qualitative reports, or short-term outcomes. Without a clear measurement framework, leaders struggle to identify root causes, while teams remain uncertain about what specifically needs improvement.
Subjective measurement traps organizations in a recurring cycle: more work, more meetings, more reports—yet little improvement in operational quality.
When Correcting Errors Matters More Than Doing More
The year 2025 reveals a clear reality: organizations are not exhausted because they do too little, but because they have been doing the wrong things for too long. If these core operational failures are not recognized and addressed, accelerating efforts in 2026 will only accelerate depletion.
Before focusing on growth, transformation, or technology adoption, organizations may need to return to a foundational question: Does the current operating system make the organization lighter or heavier each day?
Correcting fundamental operational failures is the first essential step toward a more sustainable and effective phase of development.
Lead-UP Academy | Learn to Act – Act to Lead



In many discussions with senior leadership teams, when employee turnover becomes a topic of concern, the most common reflex is to review salaries, revisit policies, or adjust benefits. However, when we analyze cases in which employees leave after six months to one or two years, one factor consistently emerges as the most decisive: the direct manager.
For many years, KPIs have been a familiar concept in corporate management. Almost every organization has KPIs, every department is assigned targets, and every individual is given numerical goals. However, as organizations enter the digital era—where data, technology, and AI fundamentally reshape operations—an increasing number of companies face a paradox: KPIs are abundant, yet actual performance improvement remains limited.
Vietnam’s economy is entering a challenging phase: markets are volatile, input costs are rising, consumer behavior is shifting, skilled labor is scarce, and customers are becoming increasingly demanding.
Throughout our journey accompanying many service enterprises in Vietnam, we at Lead-UP Academy have repeatedly encountered familiar situations: the business is growing, customers are increasing, yet internal operations begin to get... “messy.” Senior employees work based on habit. New employees work based on personal interpretation. And leaders become weary because “everything depends on people” when there is still no clear operational system with standardized procedures and practices.
As a department head, deputy manager, or team leader, you are the “bridge” between senior leadership and frontline employees. The success or failure of your department largely depends on how you organize, lead, and adapt. And today’s context is fundamentally different from the past: we are living in the AI & VUCA era – where everything is volatile (Volatility), uncertain (Uncertainty), increasingly complex (Complexity), and often ambiguous (Ambiguity). So, what does the “portrait” of a mid-level manager look like in order not just to survive, but to truly thrive in this environment?
In recent conversations with businesses, we have noticed a recurring question: “How can we retain and develop Gen Z – the young generation of employees who are increasingly making up a large share of the workforce?”