In recent conversations with businesses, we have noticed a recurring question: “How can we retain and develop Gen Z – the young generation of employees who are increasingly making up a large share of the workforce?”

Gen Z – Different and Challenging
Gen Z was born in the digital era, raised with smartphones, social media, and now AI. They carry three distinct characteristics that every leader should pay attention to:
The current pain point for many Vietnamese businesses is clear: hiring Gen Z is relatively easy, but retaining and developing them is the real challenge.
Why Coaching & Mentoring Is the Key
I often call coaching and mentoring the “vaccine” against fragmentation and disconnection in multi-generational workplaces.
Where Should Businesses Start?
From numerous coaching projects, I have distilled several practical starting points:
A Practical Case
We once worked with a retail group where the turnover rate of Gen Z employees within six months was nearly 40%. After rolling out the “Mentor Gen Z” program—pairing each manager with one-on-one mentees and combining mentoring with on-the-job training:
These are not just numbers; they are proof of the power of coaching and mentoring when done right.
Conclusion
Gen Z does not need a perfect company. What they truly need is an environment where they can learn, experiment, be mentored, and see a clear path of growth.
Coaching and mentoring—if businesses truly invest—will become the **“golden key” to retaining Gen Z and shaping the next generation of leaders for sustainable growth in the digital era.
Wishing you success,
Lead-UP Academy | Learn to Act – Act to Lead



In business management, certain signs may appear unrelated on the surface but, in reality, reflect the same systemic issue. A team that is becoming increasingly less willing to debate in meetings and a team that consistently fails to meet its KPIs may be two manifestations of the same management gap: managers have not accurately identified the factors constraining performance and have not created an environment in which real problems can be openly discussed.
Employee turnover is not merely an issue for the Human Resources department. From the perspective of business operations management, every employee departure can generate a series of consequences: workflow disruption, loss of organizational knowledge, increased pressure on remaining employees, additional recruitment and training costs, and a direct impact on the quality of customer service.
In customer experience management, organizations are often drawn to major concepts such as CX strategy, digital transformation, personalization, artificial intelligence, or customer relationship management systems. However, from the customer’s perspective, experience is not perceived through strategic documents, organizational charts, or slogans displayed in the office.
In modern management, many enterprises invest heavily in processes, technology, KPIs, dashboards, and control systems. However, there is an “invisible infrastructure” that directly influences the speed of coordination, the quality of decision-making, and execution performance: trust.
In many discussions with senior leadership teams, when employee turnover becomes a topic of concern, the most common reflex is to review salaries, revisit policies, or adjust benefits. However, when we analyze cases in which employees leave after six months to one or two years, one factor consistently emerges as the most decisive: the direct manager.
For many years, KPIs have been a familiar concept in corporate management. Almost every organization has KPIs, every department is assigned targets, and every individual is given numerical goals. However, as organizations enter the digital era—where data, technology, and AI fundamentally reshape operations—an increasing number of companies face a paradox: KPIs are abundant, yet actual performance improvement remains limited.
2025 has been a distinctive year. Many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have managed to sustain operations and, in some cases, achieve modest growth. However, a common sentiment among leaders is one of fatigue, tension, and a lack of operational ease. What is particularly noteworthy is that this level of exhaustion is not proportional to the effectiveness achieved.
Vietnam’s economy is entering a challenging phase: markets are volatile, input costs are rising, consumer behavior is shifting, skilled labor is scarce, and customers are becoming increasingly demanding.
Throughout our journey accompanying many service enterprises in Vietnam, we at Lead-UP Academy have repeatedly encountered familiar situations: the business is growing, customers are increasing, yet internal operations begin to get... “messy.” Senior employees work based on habit. New employees work based on personal interpretation. And leaders become weary because “everything depends on people” when there is still no clear operational system with standardized procedures and practices.
As a department head, deputy manager, or team leader, you are the “bridge” between senior leadership and frontline employees. The success or failure of your department largely depends on how you organize, lead, and adapt. And today’s context is fundamentally different from the past: we are living in the AI & VUCA era – where everything is volatile (Volatility), uncertain (Uncertainty), increasingly complex (Complexity), and often ambiguous (Ambiguity). So, what does the “portrait” of a mid-level manager look like in order not just to survive, but to truly thrive in this environment?