During a working session with a large manufacturing company in Southern Vietnam, I heard a troubling story: the plant director suddenly resigned to join a competitor. The problem was not about hiring a replacement, but about the fact that the company had no one ready to step in immediately. More than 300 workers were left waiting for direction, production plans stalled, and customers complained about delayed orders.
This is a typical example of a gap many Vietnamese companies face: a lack of a clear and long-term succession plan.
.jpg)
[Photo: A training program at the Sky-Line Education System]
Succession Planning – Why It Matters
In today’s volatile (VUCA) era, senior leaders or key managers can leave at any moment—whether due to retirement, new opportunities, or personal reasons. If the organization has no successors prepared, the entire system can quickly grind to a halt.
Succession planning is not just a “backup option.” It is a strategic approach to people development, tied directly to organizational sustainability.
Four Steps to Building a Succession Plan
From my experience working with many businesses, I have distilled a practical 4-step framework for building succession planning:
Linking Succession Planning with Long-term Strategy
A retail company I once advised did this quite effectively. When planning to expand by 50 new stores over five years, they simultaneously launched a program called “Future Store Leaders.” Young managers were trained in operations, finance, and HR, and after 2–3 years, many were ready to take on store manager roles.
As a result, when expansion came, they did not need to rush to the external market for talent. They already had a well-prepared internal pipeline. This is the true integration of succession planning with sustainable business strategy.
Conclusion
Developing successor teams is not just the responsibility of the HR department—it is a strategic mission for the entire leadership team. Done well, it prevents “leadership vacuums” when key staff leave, while building trust and motivation for the younger generation.
Remember: a strong organization is not only judged by its current leaders, but also by the successors who are ready to carry the mission forward.
Lead-UP Academy | Learn to Act – Act to Lead



Across many organizations, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam, learning and development initiatives are implemented on a regular basis. Annual training plans are established, budgets are allocated, and participation rates are generally high. Classroom engagement is often positive, and post-training evaluations frequently reflect high levels of satisfaction.
In the context of 2026, Vietnamese enterprises are simultaneously facing several critical challenges: increasing pressure to optimize costs and improve productivity; workforce volatility, particularly within operational teams and middle management; and a widening gap between strategic intent and execution capability. Through its R&D activities and practical implementations across multiple industries—including banking, telecommunications, services, hospitality, real estate, and manufacturing—Lead-UP Academy presents in this article a clear and consistent message:
In recent times, as Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been increasingly discussed in executive meetings, a recurring question has emerged: “Will AI make L&D redundant?” In some organizations, this question is taken even further: “Is it still necessary to invest in training when AI can already provide answers to almost everything?”
In modern human resource management, the 9 Box Grid (Performance – Potential) model is commonly used to classify employees. For Gen Z, this is an important tool that helps organizations identify who needs additional professional training, who requires coaching to improve performance, and who should be mentored to develop leadership potential. This context shows that coaching and mentoring are not merely management techniques but strategic approaches to building a sustainable succession pipeline.
When training fails to deliver results, it not only wastes resources but also creates negative sentiment, making it harder for the organization to implement future programs. Turning Every Course into “Learning to Act – Acting to Grow”