In modern human resource management, the 9 Box Grid (Performance – Potential) model is commonly used to classify employees. For Gen Z, this is an important tool that helps organizations identify who needs additional professional training, who requires coaching to improve performance, and who should be mentored to develop leadership potential. This context shows that coaching and mentoring are not merely management techniques but strategic approaches to building a sustainable succession pipeline.
Gen Z (born 1997–2012) is gradually becoming the core workforce in Vietnam. They have grown up in the digital era, with strong adaptability, a desire for flexible working environments, an emphasis on meaningful work, and a craving for instant feedback. However, they are also less patient and more willing to leave an organization if they do not see growth opportunities. This presents a significant challenge for Vietnamese enterprises, especially in an increasingly competitive talent market.
Modern coaching goes beyond transferring knowledge; it focuses on unlocking potential and driving behavioral change. The GROW model (Goal – Reality – Options – Will) enables employees to define goals, assess their current situation, explore options, and commit to action. The EDAC model (Explain – Demonstrate – Apply – Check) is particularly useful for on-the-job mentoring, allowing employees to learn, practice, and receive immediate feedback. When combined with the 9 Box Grid, organizations can identify the right people at the right time for coaching and mentoring, ensuring both effectiveness and sustainability.
.jpg)
Coaching and Mentoring Solutions for Gen Z
Technology, especially AI, is becoming a powerful “virtual coaching assistant.” AI can design personalized development plans, generate simulation scenarios, track progress, and provide instant feedback reports. These tools align with the digital habits of Gen Z while helping managers save time and improve effectiveness.
Coaching and mentoring Gen Z, therefore, is not just an HR activity but a strategic imperative for retaining and developing talent. Guided by proven models such as GROW, EDAC, and the 9 Box Grid, and supported by technology and empathetic leadership, Gen Z can become a strong successor force, driving organizations toward sustainable growth in the new era.
Wishing you success!
---
Lead-UP Academy | Learn to Act – Act to Lead



Across many organizations, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam, learning and development initiatives are implemented on a regular basis. Annual training plans are established, budgets are allocated, and participation rates are generally high. Classroom engagement is often positive, and post-training evaluations frequently reflect high levels of satisfaction.
In the context of 2026, Vietnamese enterprises are simultaneously facing several critical challenges: increasing pressure to optimize costs and improve productivity; workforce volatility, particularly within operational teams and middle management; and a widening gap between strategic intent and execution capability. Through its R&D activities and practical implementations across multiple industries—including banking, telecommunications, services, hospitality, real estate, and manufacturing—Lead-UP Academy presents in this article a clear and consistent message:
In recent times, as Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been increasingly discussed in executive meetings, a recurring question has emerged: “Will AI make L&D redundant?” In some organizations, this question is taken even further: “Is it still necessary to invest in training when AI can already provide answers to almost everything?”
When training fails to deliver results, it not only wastes resources but also creates negative sentiment, making it harder for the organization to implement future programs. Turning Every Course into “Learning to Act – Acting to Grow”
During a working session with a large manufacturing company in Southern Vietnam, I heard a troubling story: the plant director suddenly resigned to join a competitor. The problem was not about hiring a replacement, but about the fact that the company had no one ready to step in immediately. More than 300 workers were left waiting for direction, production plans stalled, and customers complained about delayed orders.